Insurance Dispute Settled with New Rulings

2

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The issue arose when the claimant noticed a malfunction in her dishwasher as early as April of the previous year and filed a claim in September. However, Strata Community Insurance Agencies challenged the claim arguing that the damage might engage exclusions pertaining to rodent activity.

Central to this case was a tax invoice detailing observations from a visiting plumber. According to the original report, the plumber suspected damage caused by rodents chewing on the hose. Yet, the said invoice was later altered to omit this suspicion, raising further questions about motive and clarity.

Further dialogue between the plumber and the insurer's representative disclosed that changes to the invoice were requested by the policyholder. Additionally, alternative explanations surfaced, such as potential damage from consistent interaction of the hose with the access hole each time the machine was used. The plumber did not exclude the possibility of continuous friction contributing to the damage.

The insurance provider's expert, however, observed extensive damage on the hose but reported an absence of signs that typical wear and tear would leave. The expert concluded that the use of the dishwasher was unlikely to generate sufficient force to result in such severe damage. They further stated that the condition of the hose strongly indicated rodent activity as initially suggested by the plumber.

During the dispute resolution hearing, the Australian Financial Complaints Authority evaluated the matter. They acknowledged the customer's view disputing the expert judgment but emphasized her failure to present any compelling evidence to counter the presented arguments.

The authority, after reviewing the diverse perspectives and the expert observations, ruled in favor of accepting the view that rodents were probably the primary cause of the damage. While this event originally triggered policy coverage, the clauses excluding rodent damage ultimately prevailed to deny the claim.

Echoing this outcome, an ombudsman for the AFCA commented, “I am satisfied, without evidence to contrary, it is fair that the insurer be permitted to rely on the opinions provided by the appointed consultants.” This position emphasizes the criticality of providing concrete evidence when challenging an insurer's expert analysis.

This case serves as a compelling reminder for policyholders of the complexities and critical nuances involved in insurance claims, especially those involving ambiguous causes like rodent activity. It underscores the importance of detailed documentation and professional assessments when navigating through such disputes.

Published:Thursday, 7th Nov 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

RACQ Insurance Withdraws Rideshare Vehicle Coverage

23 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori

RACQ Insurance has recently announced the cessation of coverage for rideshare and food delivery vehicles, effective from November 3, 2023. This decision stems from a notable increase in claims associated with these services, prompting the insurer to reassess its offerings. - read more

AFCA Directs Insurer to Settle Restaurant Arson Claim

23 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has recently ruled in favour of a restaurant owner, directing the insurer to honour an arson claim despite the director's failure to disclose a past criminal conviction. This decision underscores the importance of clear communication and due diligence in the insurance application process. - read more

Upcover Introduces Affordable Management Liability Insurance for SMEs

23 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori

Upcover, a Sydney-based insurtech company, has recently launched a management liability insurance product tailored specifically for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and sole traders. With premiums starting at $780 per year for a $1 million coverage limit, this offering aims to provide affordable and comprehensive protection against various business risks. - read more

CHU's 2025 Report Shows Stability in Strata Insurance Premiums Amid Climate and Regulatory Shifts

22 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori

CHU, Australia's leading strata insurance underwriting agency, has released its 2025 State of the Strata Market report, providing a comprehensive analysis of the current state of the industry. The report offers valuable insights into premium movements, the impact of weather events, regulatory developments, and emerging risks affecting strata insurance. - read more

ICA Calls for Strata Law Reforms to Address Rising Insurance Costs in Victoria

22 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori

The Insurance Council of Australia (ICA) has recently called for substantial reforms to Victoria's strata legislation, citing a direct correlation between inadequate governance and escalating insurance premiums for residents. With approximately one in five Victorians residing in strata-titled properties, the need for effective management and oversight has become increasingly critical. - read more

Click for more Insurance News