Insurance Dispute Settled with New Rulings

2

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The issue arose when the claimant noticed a malfunction in her dishwasher as early as April of the previous year and filed a claim in September. However, Strata Community Insurance Agencies challenged the claim arguing that the damage might engage exclusions pertaining to rodent activity.

Central to this case was a tax invoice detailing observations from a visiting plumber. According to the original report, the plumber suspected damage caused by rodents chewing on the hose. Yet, the said invoice was later altered to omit this suspicion, raising further questions about motive and clarity.

Further dialogue between the plumber and the insurer's representative disclosed that changes to the invoice were requested by the policyholder. Additionally, alternative explanations surfaced, such as potential damage from consistent interaction of the hose with the access hole each time the machine was used. The plumber did not exclude the possibility of continuous friction contributing to the damage.

The insurance provider's expert, however, observed extensive damage on the hose but reported an absence of signs that typical wear and tear would leave. The expert concluded that the use of the dishwasher was unlikely to generate sufficient force to result in such severe damage. They further stated that the condition of the hose strongly indicated rodent activity as initially suggested by the plumber.

During the dispute resolution hearing, the Australian Financial Complaints Authority evaluated the matter. They acknowledged the customer's view disputing the expert judgment but emphasized her failure to present any compelling evidence to counter the presented arguments.

The authority, after reviewing the diverse perspectives and the expert observations, ruled in favor of accepting the view that rodents were probably the primary cause of the damage. While this event originally triggered policy coverage, the clauses excluding rodent damage ultimately prevailed to deny the claim.

Echoing this outcome, an ombudsman for the AFCA commented, “I am satisfied, without evidence to contrary, it is fair that the insurer be permitted to rely on the opinions provided by the appointed consultants.” This position emphasizes the criticality of providing concrete evidence when challenging an insurer's expert analysis.

This case serves as a compelling reminder for policyholders of the complexities and critical nuances involved in insurance claims, especially those involving ambiguous causes like rodent activity. It underscores the importance of detailed documentation and professional assessments when navigating through such disputes.

Published:Thursday, 7th Nov 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

CHU Enhances Strata Insurance Capacity for Larger Developments

21 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori

CHU, Australia's leading strata insurance underwriting agency, has significantly increased its capacity to underwrite individual strata risks, now offering coverage up to $690 million. This substantial rise from the previous limit of $300 million is a strategic response to the evolving landscape of strata developments, which are becoming larger and more complex. - read more

ICA Advocates for Strata Law Reforms to Mitigate Rising Insurance Costs in Victoria

21 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori

The Insurance Council of Australia (ICA) has called for significant reforms to Victoria's strata legislation, citing a direct link between inadequate governance and escalating insurance premiums for residents. With approximately one in five Victorians living in strata-titled properties, the need for effective management and oversight has become increasingly critical. - read more

Significant Reductions in Australian Construction Insurance Premiums

20 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori

The Australian construction insurance market has experienced a notable shift in 2025, with premiums decreasing across various lines due to intensified competition among insurers. According to Marsh's Construction Insurance Market Update 2025, the first half of the year saw average premium reductions ranging from 5% to 15%, marking a significant departure from the upward trend observed in 2024. - read more

Elevated Construction Costs Prompt Reassessment of Insurance Strategies

20 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori

Australia's construction sector continues to grapple with elevated cost pressures, prompting builders to reassess their insurance and risk management strategies. Gallagher reports that overall construction costs have increased by over 30%, influenced by supply chain disruptions, inflation, and labour shortages. - read more

South Australia Strengthens Homeowner Insurance Amid Rising Builder Insolvencies

20 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori

The South Australian Government has taken decisive action to bolster homeowner protection in response to a surge in builder insolvencies. Effective from 1 October 2025, the maximum insurance payout for homeowners will increase from $150,000 to $250,000. This measure aims to provide greater financial security to homeowners left with incomplete or defective properties due to builder failures. - read more

Click for more Insurance News