The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
In a recent adjudication, a property owner faced a coverage denial due to damage attributed to rodents, offering a revealing insight into insurance claim disputes.
When a strata property holder reported water damage from a damaged dishwasher hose, her insurance claim was thwarted by the involvement of rodents.
The issue arose when the claimant noticed a malfunction in her dishwasher as early as April of the previous year and filed a claim in September. However, Strata Community Insurance Agencies challenged the claim arguing that the damage might engage exclusions pertaining to rodent activity.
Central to this case was a tax invoice detailing observations from a visiting plumber. According to the original report, the plumber suspected damage caused by rodents chewing on the hose. Yet, the said invoice was later altered to omit this suspicion, raising further questions about motive and clarity.
Further dialogue between the plumber and the insurer's representative disclosed that changes to the invoice were requested by the policyholder. Additionally, alternative explanations surfaced, such as potential damage from consistent interaction of the hose with the access hole each time the machine was used. The plumber did not exclude the possibility of continuous friction contributing to the damage.
The insurance provider's expert, however, observed extensive damage on the hose but reported an absence of signs that typical wear and tear would leave. The expert concluded that the use of the dishwasher was unlikely to generate sufficient force to result in such severe damage. They further stated that the condition of the hose strongly indicated rodent activity as initially suggested by the plumber.
During the dispute resolution hearing, the Australian Financial Complaints Authority evaluated the matter. They acknowledged the customer's view disputing the expert judgment but emphasized her failure to present any compelling evidence to counter the presented arguments.
The authority, after reviewing the diverse perspectives and the expert observations, ruled in favor of accepting the view that rodents were probably the primary cause of the damage. While this event originally triggered policy coverage, the clauses excluding rodent damage ultimately prevailed to deny the claim.
Echoing this outcome, an ombudsman for the AFCA commented, “I am satisfied, without evidence to contrary, it is fair that the insurer be permitted to rely on the opinions provided by the appointed consultants.” This position emphasizes the criticality of providing concrete evidence when challenging an insurer's expert analysis.
This case serves as a compelling reminder for policyholders of the complexities and critical nuances involved in insurance claims, especially those involving ambiguous causes like rodent activity. It underscores the importance of detailed documentation and professional assessments when navigating through such disputes.
Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.
In February 2026, a café and catering business faced significant financial challenges after a storm caused extensive damage, leading to a prolonged closure. The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) ruled that the café's underinsurance resulted in reduced claim payouts, highlighting the critical need for businesses to ensure their insurance coverage accurately reflects their risk exposure. - read more
In June 2025, the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) ruled in favor of a restaurant's arson claim, despite the director's failure to disclose his criminal history during the policy's inception. This decision highlights the complexities surrounding disclosure obligations and the importance of clear communication between insurers and policyholders. - read more
In December 2025, the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) upheld AIG's decision to deny a landlord's theft claim, citing the landlord's failure to disclose that the leased property was used for religious meetings. This case highlights the paramount importance of accurate disclosure regarding property use in insurance agreements. - read more
In a significant development for New South Wales' strata sector, Productivity Commissioner Peter Achterstraat has recommended the prompt prohibition of commissions received by strata managers. This move aims to safeguard the interests of apartment owners, especially as strata living becomes increasingly prevalent in Sydney. - read more
CHU, Australia's leading strata insurance underwriting agency, has released its 2025 State of the Strata Market report, providing a comprehensive analysis of the current state of the industry. The report indicates that strata insurance premiums have experienced a modest increase of 2.8%, rising from an average of $954 to $981 per lot annually in the year leading up to June 2025. This increment is notably lower than the 14% surge observed in house insurance premiums during the same period. - read more
Accidental income protection insurance is a type of policy that provides financial support if you are unable to work due to an accident. Unlike regular income protection insurance, which can cover illnesses and injuries, this specific insurance focuses solely on accidents. - read more
When life takes an unexpected turn, whether due to illness, injury, or other unforeseen events, the financial repercussions can be devastating. This is where income protection insurance becomes an essential component of maintaining financial stability. Income protection insurance acts as a safety net, ensuring that even in times of hardship, your financial obligations can be met, and your standard of living maintained. - read more
In the face of life's unpredictable twists and turns, few things are as disconcerting as the possibility of suddenly losing your ability to earn an income due to illness. Such events are often unexpected and can have significant financial repercussions that interrupt not only your flow of daily life but also compromise your future plans. - read more
In the uncertain times we face today, where both health and economic climates are unpredictable, safeguarding your financial stability becomes paramount. This is where income protection insurance steps in as an essential safety net. For many Australian families, it's the buffer that ensures life's financial commitments are met, even when ability to work is compromised. - read more
Income protection insurance is a type of personal insurance that provides financial support if you are unable to work due to illness or injury. It ensures that you continue to receive a portion of your income, helping you manage daily expenses and financial commitments during recovery. - read more
Knowledgebase
No-Fault Insurance: A type of car insurance where your insurer pays for your damages regardless of who is at fault in an accident.
