Income Insurance Online :: News
SHARE

Share this news item!

Car Collector Fails in Bid for $122k Insurance Windfall

Car Collector Fails in Bid for $122k Insurance Windfall

Car Collector Fails in Bid for $122k Insurance Windfall?w=400

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

A car enthusiast's efforts to boost his insurance payout from $78,000 to $200,000 after his rare vehicle was destroyed by fire have been thwarted.

The dispute began when the owner's 2005 HSV Coupe GTO Z Series succumbed to flames in March of the previous year. RACQ Insurance accepted the total loss and initially valued the vehicle at $68,000.

However, the unsatisfied owner declined this offer, leading to an independent valuation which described the car as being in “good condition for its age and mileage” despite its 315,000km on the odometer.

Although comparable lower-mileage vehicles were advertised above $81,000, the heavy usage severely reduced its collectible appeal, the independent valuer noted. Conclusively, the evaluator deemed the insurer's offer reasonable.

The car owner contested this, alleging RACQ Insurance's assessment was flawed, particularly regarding the engine type and the car's rarity as one of only 60 manual transmission models, asserting its condition was excellent.

In response, RACQ revised their offer to $78,000 factoring in the vehicle's unique modifications and reconditioned engine, but the claimant stood firm in his refusal.

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), upon review, sided with the insurer. AFCA deemed RACQ Insurance's valuation and the independent assessment to be “logical, well-considered and helpful.”

According to Glass's Guide referenced by the AFCA, the vehicle's maximum estimated market value could not exceed $58,100, considering its age and mileage. Although rare, evidence was insufficient to justify a $200,000 evaluation.

The AFCA stated, “The complainant has not provided persuasive evidence to demonstrate the vehicle's worth is beyond what the insurer offered. Under such conditions, adjusting the settlement upward would not be justifiable.”

Reference: Original findings from the Australian Financial Complaints Authority's ruling were sourced from RACQ Insurance's appeal letter. Read more about the decision here.

Published:Wednesday, 24th Jul 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Rate this article

0 Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.

Insurance News

HESTA Announces 12% Reduction in Insurance Fees to Benefit Members
HESTA Announces 12% Reduction in Insurance Fees to Benefit Members
18 May 2026: Paige Estritori
HESTA, a leading Australian superannuation fund, has unveiled a significant reduction in insurance fees, aiming to make coverage more accessible and affordable for its members. Effective from 1 July 2026, the fund will implement an average 12% decrease across all insurance cover types, including death, total and permanent disablement (TPD), and income protection. - read more
Rising Mental Health Claims Drive Surge in Income Support Demand
Rising Mental Health Claims Drive Surge in Income Support Demand
18 May 2026: Paige Estritori
Recent data reveals a significant increase in the number of Australians accessing income support, with over 8 million individuals receiving assistance in the past year. This surge is largely attributed to a rise in mental health-related claims, highlighting a pressing issue within the workforce. - read more
AFCA Supports Insurer in Income Protection Offset Dispute
AFCA Supports Insurer in Income Protection Offset Dispute
18 May 2026: Paige Estritori
The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has recently ruled in favour of Nippon Life Insurance in a dispute concerning income protection (IP) offsets, confirming an overpayment of nearly $18,000 and supporting the insurer's decision to suspend benefits during the reconciliation of compulsory third party (CTP) income. - read more
Australian Cosmetic Prices Surge Amid Middle East Supply Disruptions
Australian Cosmetic Prices Surge Amid Middle East Supply Disruptions
18 May 2026: Paige Estritori
Recent geopolitical tensions in the Middle East have led to significant disruptions in crude oil supply, resulting in increased costs for petroleum-derived raw materials essential to the cosmetic industry. This development is causing a notable rise in the prices of beauty products across Australia. - read more
Australian Health Insurers Criticised for Aggressive Negotiation Tactics
Australian Health Insurers Criticised for Aggressive Negotiation Tactics
18 May 2026: Paige Estritori
Recent reports have brought to light concerns regarding the negotiation practices of major health insurers in Australia. Private hospitals have accused these insurers of employing aggressive tactics that may be contributing to the closure of services and facilities across the country. - read more


Life Insurance Articles

Income Safety Net: How to Choose the Right Income Protection for Your Lifestyle
Income Safety Net: How to Choose the Right Income Protection for Your Lifestyle
In the face of life's unpredictable twists and turns, few things are as disconcerting as the possibility of suddenly losing your ability to earn an income due to illness. Such events are often unexpected and can have significant financial repercussions that interrupt not only your flow of daily life but also compromise your future plans. - read more
Income Protection vs. Life Insurance: What's Best for You?
Income Protection vs. Life Insurance: What's Best for You?
Financial protection is an essential aspect of sound financial planning. It ensures that you and your family are safeguarded against unexpected events that could lead to financial hardship. Two common types of financial protection are income protection insurance and life insurance. - read more
Income Protection Insurance: Understanding Waiting Periods and Benefit Periods
Income Protection Insurance: Understanding Waiting Periods and Benefit Periods
Income protection insurance is a financial product designed to support individuals in the event that they are unable to work due to illness or injury. This type of insurance provides a regular income, helping to replace a portion of lost earnings and meet daily living expenses. Virtually anyone earning an income, especially those with financial dependents or significant debts, should consider the peace of mind that income protection can offer. - read more
Navigating Pre-existing Conditions in Income Protection Insurance
Navigating Pre-existing Conditions in Income Protection Insurance
Income protection insurance is a safeguard that provides individuals with financial stability in the event they are unable to work due to illness or injury. This type of insurance typically replaces a significant percentage of the insured's income, ensuring that their financial commitments can still be met during periods when they cannot earn an income through employment. - read more
Income Protection Insurance and Tax Benefits: What You Should Know
Income Protection Insurance and Tax Benefits: What You Should Know
Income protection insurance is a type of cover designed to provide you with a safety net if you are unable to work due to illness or injury. By offering regular payments that replace a portion of your income, it helps ensure that you can maintain your lifestyle and cover essential expenses during challenging times. - read more

Knowledgebase
Incontestability Clause:
A provision in a life insurance policy that prevents the insurer from voiding coverage due to a misstatement by the insured after a certain period.