AFCA Upholds Insurer’s Decision in Breast Cancer Claim Case

2

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The woman was diagnosed with cancer in her right breast on October 5 of last year, followed by the discovery of cancer in her left breast eight days later. She filed claims under her critical illness policy that she had obtained on July 17.

However, TAL Life, her insurance provider, rejected the claims based on the policy's three-month qualifying period for cancer coverage.

In its ruling, AFCA noted that the policy had provisions to potentially waive the qualifying period if the policyholder could prove they were insured either under a previous TAL policy or by another insurer for the same events, right before their new coverage commenced.

The claimant contended that she had cancer coverage through an insurance policy provided by her husband's employer. She presented a letter from the employer affirming that she was covered under a "life, accident, critical illness, and medical insurance" scheme from August 2020 until June last year. Additionally, she showed documentation indicating her husband’s policy did include critical illness coverage for spouses, encompassing cancer.

While AFCA accepted the availability of this cancer coverage, it was not convinced that she held such coverage "immediately before the current policy began." It also noted she had failed to disclose her previous insurance when applying for the new policy with TAL Life.

"There is no information before me about the extent of the critical illness cover the complainant had, if any, through her husband's employer’s insurance arrangements," AFCA’s ombudsman stated.

"Furthermore, it appears that any cover she might have had ceased about a month before the new policy started. I am not convinced there was 'continuity of cover' as suggested by the complainant."

The ombudsman expressed AFCA’s sympathy towards the claimant, especially given that the diagnoses occurred "very close to the end of the qualifying period." Nonetheless, he emphasized that there was no valid reason for the qualifying period to be dismissed.

"The qualifying period is reasonably short and its existence is not unjust. These terms are part of all insurance policies and they draw necessary boundaries. The enforcement of these terms is not inherently unfair," the ombudsman elaborated.

For a more detailed account of the ruling, refer to the original report by AFCA.

Published:Wednesday, 4th Sep 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Healthscope's Contract Terminations: Implications for Millions of Australians

06 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori

Healthscope, Australia's second-largest private hospital operator, has announced the termination of its agreements with major health insurers Bupa and the Australian Health Services Alliance (AHSA). This decision is set to affect approximately 6.6 million Australians, potentially leading to increased out-of-pocket expenses for those seeking treatment at Healthscope's 38 hospitals nationwide. - read more

Government Directs Health Insurers to Increase Private Hospital Funding

06 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian government has issued a directive to health insurers, requiring them to allocate a greater portion of their increased premiums to private hospitals. This move aims to enhance patient care and support the financial stability of private healthcare facilities. - read more

AMA Report Card Reveals Erosion of Value in Private Health Insurance

06 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian Medical Association (AMA) has released its latest Private Health Insurance Report Card, indicating a concerning trend where Australians are paying higher premiums for private health insurance while receiving diminished value in return. - read more

Allianz Australia and AWP Australia Penalised for Misleading Practices

06 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori

In a significant regulatory action, Allianz Australia and its subsidiary, AWP Australia, have been fined $16.8 million for making false and misleading statements to consumers. This penalty underscores the critical need for transparency and honesty within the insurance industry. - read more

Rising Insurance Premiums Challenge Northern Australian Homeowners

06 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori

Homeowners in Northern Australia are grappling with substantial increases in insurance premiums, despite the establishment of a cyclone reinsurance pool intended to alleviate such financial burdens. This situation raises critical questions about the pool's effectiveness and the broader challenges facing the insurance industry in high-risk regions. - read more

Click for more Insurance News