Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

3

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Allianz Partners Introduces Tailored Cruise Travel Insurance for Australians

22 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori

In a strategic move to cater to the growing number of Australian cruise enthusiasts, Allianz Partners has unveiled a cruise-specific travel insurance product in collaboration with Norwegian Cruise Line (NCL). This initiative aims to provide comprehensive coverage tailored to the unique needs of cruise travellers. - read more

Australian Insurers Face Challenges in Cybersecurity Readiness

22 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori

Recent findings from the PwC Insurance Banana Skins Survey reveal that Australian insurers are trailing behind their global counterparts in cybersecurity preparedness. This lag is particularly concerning given the rapid evolution of cyber threats, especially those enhanced by artificial intelligence (AI). - read more

Australian General Insurers Report Record Profits Amid Premium Hikes

22 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori

Australia's general insurance industry has reported a remarkable financial performance, achieving a 19% return on equity (ROE) for the 2025 financial year-the highest in a decade. This significant milestone reflects a combination of strategic premium increases and favourable market conditions. - read more

Australian Life Insurance Sector Anticipates Steady Growth Amid Economic Recovery

22 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori

The Australian life insurance market is on a trajectory of steady growth, with projections indicating an increase in gross written premiums (GWP) from $26.2 billion in 2025 to $30.5 billion by 2029. This represents a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 3.9%, reflecting a positive outlook for the sector. - read more

ICA Advocates for Overhaul of Civil Liability Laws Amid Rising Insurance Premiums

22 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori

The Insurance Council of Australia (ICA) has recently released a white paper highlighting the urgent need for reforms to state and territory civil liability laws, which have remained largely unchanged for nearly 25 years. These outdated laws are contributing to significant increases in public liability insurance premiums, affecting a wide range of businesses across the nation. - read more

Click for more Insurance News