Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

3

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Envest Group Unveils TLI Underwriting for Heavy Motor Fleets

08 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori

Envest Group, a prominent player in Australia's insurance sector, has announced the launch of TLI Underwriting, a new agency dedicated to providing specialised insurance solutions for heavy motor fleet operators. This strategic move aims to address the unique challenges faced by larger transport businesses in Australia. - read more

Queensland Aligns Heavy Vehicle Compliance with National Regulator

08 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori

In a significant move towards regulatory consistency, Queensland has transferred its heavy vehicle compliance responsibilities to the National Heavy Vehicle Regulator (NHVR). This transition aligns Queensland with New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia, Tasmania, and the Australian Capital Territory, all of which have already integrated their heavy vehicle regulations under the NHVR's oversight. - read more

NTI Report Highlights Human Error as Primary Cause of Major Truck Crashes

08 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori

According to the latest report from the National Truck Accident Research Centre (NTARC), human error remains the predominant cause of major truck crashes in Australia. The study, supported by National Transport Insurance (NTI), reveals that inattention and distraction are leading contributors to these incidents, accounting for nearly one-third of all human factor-related crashes. - read more

Australian Insurers Falling Behind in Cyber Risk Readiness

08 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori

Recent findings from PwC's Insurance Banana Skins Survey indicate that Australian insurers are trailing their global counterparts in preparedness for cyber threats. The survey, which gathered insights from 698 insurance executives across 42 territories, revealed that Australian insurers scored 6.6% lower on the Preparedness Index compared to the global average. - read more

ASIC's 2026 Compliance Focus: Implications for the Insurance Sector

08 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has unveiled its enforcement priorities for 2026, placing a significant emphasis on the insurance sector. Key areas of focus include insurance claims handling, pricing transparency, and financial reporting, reflecting ASIC's commitment to addressing both new and ongoing risks within the financial landscape. - read more

Click for more Insurance News