Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

3

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Australian Insurers Achieve Record Profits Amid Rising Premiums

04 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori

In 2024, Australia's insurance industry reported an after-tax profit of $6.1 billion, a figure that is three times higher than the five-year average of $2 billion. This substantial increase is attributed to significant premium hikes and a relatively benign year for natural disasters. - read more

Calls for Greater Transparency as Insurance Premiums Soar

04 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori

Australian homeowners are facing significant increases in insurance premiums, with some reporting hikes of up to 600% over the past year. This trend has prompted consumer advocacy groups to call for greater transparency from insurers regarding the factors driving these substantial increases. - read more

Rising Insurance Costs in NT Challenge Cyclone Reinsurance Efforts

04 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori

Homeowners in the Northern Territory are experiencing significant increases in insurance premiums, despite the federal government's establishment of a cyclone reinsurance pool in 2022 aimed at reducing costs in cyclone-prone areas. - read more

Australian Food Super Implements Age-Based Insurance Premium Structure

03 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori

Australian Food Super has announced a transition to age-based pricing for its insurance offerings, a move that will see premium costs vary according to members' age brackets. Effective November 1, 2025, this change aims to align insurance costs more closely with the risk profiles associated with different age groups. - read more

Australian Life and Income Protection Insurance Premiums Experience Notable Decline

03 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori

Recent research from Rainmaker Information indicates a significant decrease in life and income protection insurance premiums across Australia. Direct life premiums have fallen by 7% since 2024, while direct income protection premiums have seen reductions of 12% and 13% for policies with 30-day and 90-day waiting periods, respectively. - read more

Click for more Insurance News