Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Hutch Underwriting's New Landlord Insurance Policy Integrates Cyber Protection

20 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori

In August 2025, Hutch Underwriting unveiled a new landlord insurance product tailored for Australian residential property owners. This policy stands out by incorporating built-in cyber protection, addressing the growing digital risks landlords face in today's interconnected world. - read more

Australian Medical Association Advocates for Reforms in Private Health Insurance

19 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian Medical Association (AMA) has intensified its call for comprehensive reforms in the private health insurance sector, particularly in response to the recent 4.41% average premium increase effective from April 2026. This hike, the largest in nearly a decade, has raised concerns about the affordability and value of private health coverage for Australians. - read more

Australian Government Outlaws 'Product Phoenixing' in Health Insurance

19 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian government has introduced legislation to prohibit the practice known as 'product phoenixing' within the private health insurance sector. This move aims to enhance transparency and fairness for consumers by preventing insurers from closing existing policies and reintroducing nearly identical ones at higher premiums. - read more

HCF and Netball Australia Strengthen Commitment to Women's Health

19 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori

HCF, Australia's largest not-for-profit health fund, has announced the extension of its major partnership with Netball Australia and Super Netball, continuing as the sport's official health insurance partner through to the end of 2027. This renewal underscores HCF's dedication to improving the health and wellbeing of Australian women by supporting netball at all levels-from grassroots participation to elite competition. - read more

Gold-Level Health Insurance Premiums to Surge by Up to 25% in 2026

19 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori

Recent analysis by consumer advocacy group CHOICE has revealed that Australians holding gold-level health insurance policies may face premium increases of up to 25% starting in April 2026. This substantial hike significantly exceeds the average 4.41% increase approved by the government for private health insurance premiums. - read more

Click for more Insurance News