Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

New Heavy Vehicle Law Puts Safety Systems Under the Insurance Spotlight

23 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

Australia’s updated Heavy Vehicle National Law is moving from policy discussion to operational reality, with the new framework scheduled to commence on 1 August 2026 in HVNL-participating states and territories. For transport operators, this is more than a compliance calendar item. It is a signal that safety systems, driver fitness, fatigue controls and record-keeping will carry greater weight when insurers assess risk, price cover and review claims. - read more

Why Digital Incident Reporting Matters for Truck Fleets

22 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

A recent Fleet Auto News report has put a timely spotlight on one of the least glamorous but most important parts of fleet management: incident reporting. Many transport businesses still rely on paper forms, email trails and spreadsheets to record vehicle damage, accidents and minor incidents. Those methods may feel familiar, but they can leave operators with delayed reports, incomplete details and data that is difficult to use when a claim, audit or premium review arrives. - read more

General Insurance Code Review Could Change the Claims Experience for Tradies

22 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

Australia’s general insurance sector is edging closer to a major update to the rules that shape how insurers deal with customers, including small business owners and self-employed tradespeople. Financial Services Minister Daniel Mulino has signalled he wants meaningful progress on the review of the General Insurance Code of Practice, with the industry preparing a redrafted version for consultation. - read more

AI Risk Is Creating New Questions for Professional Cover

22 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

A fresh warning from Australian medical indemnity underwriter Tego has highlighted a risk that many businesses are only beginning to confront: artificial intelligence may not fit neatly inside existing insurance categories. As AI tools become embedded in diagnosis, administration, client advice, document drafting, fraud detection and customer service, the question is no longer simply whether a mistake occurred. It is also who made the decision, who controlled the system and which policy should respond. - read more

Victoria’s Strata Commission Debate Puts Transparency Back in Focus

22 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

Victoria’s owners corporation reform process has put strata insurance commissions back under the microscope, after the state government opted to further examine an expert panel recommendation to ban certain financial benefits paid to owners corporation managers and related entities. - read more

Click for more Insurance News