Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Author: Paige Estritori
Sources

Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Key Challenges for Australian Insurers in 2026: Premiums, Cybersecurity, and Talent

20 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

As the Australian insurance industry progresses through 2026, it faces a trio of significant challenges: escalating premium costs, increasing cyber threats, and a tightening labour market. These issues are reshaping the sector's priorities and strategies. - read more

Significant Decline in Australian Commercial Insurance Rates in Late 2025

20 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

In the final quarter of 2025, Australia's commercial insurance sector experienced a notable 12% reduction in rates, marking the most substantial decrease among eight regions monitored by Marsh Risk's Global Insurance Market Index. This trend reflects a broader global pattern of declining insurance rates, with the composite index falling for the sixth consecutive quarter. - read more

Upcoming 4.41% Increase in Australian Private Health Insurance Premiums

20 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

Starting 1 April 2026, Australians will face an average increase of 4.41% in private health insurance premiums, marking the most significant rise since 2017. This adjustment comes in the wake of escalating healthcare costs and increased utilisation of health services. - read more

ICA Advocates for Overhaul of Civil Liability Laws Amid Rising Insurance Premiums

20 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

The Insurance Council of Australia (ICA) has recently released a white paper highlighting the urgent need for reforms to state and territory civil liability laws, which have remained largely unchanged for nearly 25 years. These outdated laws are contributing to significant increases in public liability insurance premiums, affecting a wide range of businesses across the nation. - read more

Severe Hailstorms Lead to Sharp Decline in Insurance Industry Profits

20 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian insurance industry has experienced a notable decline in profits during the December quarter, primarily due to severe hailstorms that occurred in October and November. According to data from the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA), the general insurance sector reported a net profit of $132 million for the quarter, bringing the annual total to approximately $5.8 billion. This marks a decrease from the $6.8 billion profit recorded in 2024. - read more

Click for more Insurance News