Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Why climate disclosure rules should prompt a cover check

01 Sep 2026: Paige Estritori

Australia’s mandatory climate-related financial disclosure regime is moving from policy discussion into practical reporting, and consultants who support sustainability, governance, risk, data, finance or transformation projects should pay close attention. The rules initially apply to larger entities, but their impact is likely to spread through procurement, due diligence and supply chain expectations. - read more

Why Slower Building Approvals Can Become an Insurance Issue

01 Sep 2026: Paige Estritori

Australia’s latest building approvals commentary has again highlighted a difficult reality for the construction sector: the national housing task is ambitious, but the project pipeline remains uneven. Industry groups have pointed to approvals volatility, planning delays and capacity constraints as continuing barriers to lifting housing supply at the pace governments want. - read more

Why NSW Levy Reform Matters for Personal Trainers

01 Sep 2026: Paige Estritori

NSW’s move to redesign the way emergency services are funded has put business insurance affordability back in focus. For personal trainers, bootcamp operators and small studio owners, the issue is more practical than political: when statutory charges are added to premiums, cover can become harder to maintain at the level a growing fitness business actually needs. - read more

Cyclone Reinsurance Pool Puts Cover Affordability Back in Focus

01 Sep 2026: Paige Estritori

The latest monitoring of Australia’s cyclone reinsurance pool has again highlighted a key reality for households and small businesses in cyclone-exposed regions: government-backed premium relief can help, but it does not remove the need to check whether cover is suitable, affordable and realistically sized for the risk. - read more

What Fresh Claims Data Says About the Value of Life Insurance

01 Sep 2026: Paige Estritori

Fresh industry claims data has put a timely spotlight on the role life insurance continues to play for Australian families, workers and business owners. While premiums and affordability often dominate the conversation, the latest sector snapshot is a reminder that life cover is ultimately tested at claim time, when a death, serious illness, disability or extended inability to work can quickly become a financial shock. - read more

Click for more Insurance News