Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

3

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Australian Insurance Premiums Set to Soar Amid Rising Demand

26 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian general insurance industry is on a trajectory of significant growth, with direct written premiums projected to surpass $144 billion by 2029. This forecast reflects a compound annual growth rate of approximately 4.7% from the $94.7 billion recorded in the previous year. - read more

Comprehensive Professional Indemnity Insurance Now Available for Australian Tradies

26 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori

Hutch Underwriting has recently unveiled enhanced professional indemnity (PI) insurance policies specifically designed for Australian tradespeople. These new offerings aim to provide comprehensive coverage by integrating advice, design, and incidental cyber exposures into a single solution. - read more

Rising Construction Costs Impact Insurance Claims in Australia

26 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian construction industry is currently facing significant challenges, including escalating material costs and a shortage of skilled labour. These issues are contributing to increased insurance claims costs, affecting tradespeople and insurers alike. - read more

Significant Reduction in Farm Liability Claims Reflects Enhanced Safety Practices

25 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori

Recent data from WFI Insurance indicates a substantial 75% decrease in farm liability claims over the past year, suggesting that Australian farmers are adopting more effective safety measures. This decline is particularly notable in incidents involving falls from height, which have reached their lowest level in four years. - read more

Heightened Road Risks During Holiday Season Due to Increased Freight Traffic

25 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori

As Australia enters the summer holiday season, insurers and transport specialists are raising alarms about heightened road risks resulting from the convergence of increased freight activity and holiday travel. This period sees a significant uptick in both passenger vehicles and heavy trucks on the roads, amplifying the potential for accidents and safety incidents. - read more

Click for more Insurance News