Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

3

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

WFI Insurance's $250,000 Donation Supports Flood-Affected Queensland Farmers

30 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori

In response to the catastrophic flooding that has devastated parts of western Queensland, WFI Insurance has stepped forward with a substantial donation of $250,000 to Rural Aid. This contribution is aimed at bolstering relief efforts for farming communities grappling with the aftermath of the region's most severe floods in half a century. - read more

AFCA Supports Significant Home Insurance Premium Increase Based on Updated Flood Risk Assessment

30 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has recently upheld a substantial increase in home insurance premiums for a property, attributing the rise to updated assessments of flood risk. This decision underscores the critical role of accurate risk evaluation in determining insurance costs and the necessity for property owners to stay informed about potential changes in their risk profiles. - read more

Envest Group's TLI Underwriting: A New Era for Large Truck Fleet Insurance

30 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori

Envest Group, a prominent player in the insurance industry, has announced the launch of TLI Underwriting, a new heavy motor agency set to commence operations at the end of this month. TLI Underwriting will function as an authorised representative of Envest's heavy motor specialist underwriter, ATL Insurance Group. - read more

AFCA's Decision Highlights Importance of Accurate Insurance Declarations

30 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has recently ruled against a trucking company that misrepresented its insurance history and operational details when obtaining a policy from NTI. This decision underscores the critical importance of providing accurate information during the insurance application process. - read more

Regulators Call for Immediate Action in Australia's Pension Sector

30 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori

Australia's financial regulators, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), have issued a strong directive to the nation's A$4.5 trillion superannuation industry. They emphasize the urgent need for accelerated preparations to accommodate an estimated 2.5 million individuals expected to retire within the next decade. - read more

Click for more Insurance News