Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Australian Life Insurers Achieve Significant Underwriting Gains in Q4 2025

23 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian life insurance sector has reported a substantial underwriting gain of $279 million for the December quarter of 2025, a significant improvement from the $36 million recorded in the same period the previous year. This data, released by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA), highlights a notable turnaround in the industry's financial performance. - read more

Record Profits for Australian General Insurers in 2024

23 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

Australia's general insurance industry has reported an unprecedented after-tax profit of $6.1 billion for the year 2024, marking a significant milestone in the sector's financial performance. This figure is three times higher than the five-year average of $2 billion, according to KPMG's General Insurance Insights report. - read more

IAG Achieves 33% Increase in Insurance Profit Amid Lower Claims

23 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

Insurance Australia Group (IAG), the country's largest insurer, has reported a 33% increase in its full-year insurance profit, reaching A$606 million for the 12 months ending June 2025. This significant growth is attributed to a combination of reduced claims expenses and strategic premium adjustments. - read more

Adore Beauty's Nationwide Expansion: Nine New Stores Opened

23 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

Adore Beauty, a prominent name in Australia's online beauty retail sector, has significantly expanded its physical presence by opening nine new stores across the country. This strategic move marks a substantial shift from its digital-only model, aiming to provide customers with a more immersive shopping experience. - read more

Introducing 'Bad Beauty Experience Insurance' for Client Protection

23 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

In a groundbreaking move, Botched Babes has unveiled 'Bad Beauty Experience Insurance,' a novel product designed to compensate clients for unsatisfactory beauty services. This initiative addresses a longstanding gap in the market, offering financial recourse to individuals dissatisfied with their beauty treatments. - read more

Click for more Insurance News