Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Author: Paige Estritori
Sources

Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Government Backs 12 Projects to Boost Heavy Vehicle Safety

22 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian Government, in collaboration with the National Heavy Vehicle Regulator (NHVR), has announced a $4.2 million investment in 12 industry-led projects designed to improve heavy vehicle safety across the nation. This funding is part of the Heavy Vehicle Safety Initiative (HVSI), which has supported over 181 projects with more than $45 million since its inception in 2016. - read more

Climate Change's Impact on Rising Home Insurance Premiums

22 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

In recent developments, Insurance Australia Group (IAG) has raised concerns about the escalating impact of climate change on home insurance premiums. The insurer's latest report indicates that Australians should anticipate higher costs due to the increasing frequency and severity of weather events. - read more

AI Adoption Transforms Efficiency and Risk Management in Australian Insurance

22 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian insurance industry is undergoing a significant transformation through the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies. Insurers are leveraging AI to enhance operational efficiency, improve customer service, and refine risk management practices, positioning themselves as data-driven, digital-first organizations. - read more

Budget Direct Achieves Top Honors as Australia's Insurer of the Year

21 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

Budget Direct has been honored with the inaugural 'Insurer of the Year' title at the 2026 Finder Provider of the Year Awards, solidifying its position as a leading choice for Australians seeking exceptional insurance coverage. This recognition is accompanied by four additional category wins, making Budget Direct the most awarded provider in this year's ceremony. - read more

Australian Insurers Advocate for Legislation Against Unfair Claims Practices

21 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

The Insurance Council of Australia (ICA) has expressed strong support for the proposed Competition and Consumer Amendment (Unfair Trading Practices) Bill 2026, which aims to establish a general prohibition on unfair trading practices within Australian Consumer Law. This legislation is designed to empower regulators to take decisive action against predatory operators, particularly within the claims management sector. - read more

Click for more Insurance News