Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Significant Decline in Australian Commercial Insurance Rates

25 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

In the final quarter of 2025, Australian commercial insurance rates experienced a substantial decline of 12%, marking the most significant drop among the eight regions monitored by Marsh Risk's Global Insurance Market Index. This trend reflects a broader pattern of decreasing rates that began in early 2024, with the Pacific region, predominantly Australia, leading the way. - read more

Human Factors Dominate Causes of Major Truck Crashes in Australia

25 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

The National Truck Accident Research Centre's 2025 Major Incident Investigation Report, supported by NTI, has identified human error as the predominant cause of major truck crashes in Australia. The report indicates that factors such as inattention, distraction, and inappropriate speed account for a significant proportion of these incidents. - read more

ASIC Launches Review into Motor Insurance Pricing Practices

25 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has initiated a comprehensive review into the accuracy and transparency of motor insurance pricing among major insurers, covering approximately two-thirds of the car insurance market. This investigation aims to ensure that insurers comply with legal disclosure requirements and provide clear explanations for premium calculations. - read more

AIA Australia's Latest Enhancements to Priority Protection Insurance

24 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

AIA Australia has recently updated its Priority Protection life insurance suite, introducing changes designed to simplify discounts, enhance policy clarity, and support premium affordability. These enhancements, effective from 9 November 2025, reflect AIA's commitment to providing value-driven solutions for policyholders. - read more

Australia's Life Insurance Coverage Falls Short of Global Standards

24 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

Recent findings from a survey conducted by Zurich and the University of Oxford reveal that Australia has one of the lowest life insurance penetration rates globally. The study indicates that only 27% of Australians have income protection insurance, and 25% possess life insurance coverage. These figures are notably lower than the global averages of 33% for income protection and 32% for life insurance. - read more

Click for more Insurance News