Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

3

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Inattention and Speed Identified as Key Factors in Australian Truck Crashes

06 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori

The National Truck Accident Research Centre (NTARC) has released its 2025 Major Incident Investigation Report, shedding light on the primary human factors contributing to significant truck crashes across Australia. The findings emphasise the critical roles of inattention, distraction, and inappropriate speed in these incidents, underscoring the necessity for targeted safety interventions within the transport industry. - read more

QBE and Sure Insurance Forge New Home Cover Partnership

06 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori

QBE Australia Pacific has recently entered into a strategic partnership with Sure Insurance, aiming to bolster its broker-distributed householders cover. This collaboration signifies a concerted effort to provide more comprehensive and accessible home insurance solutions tailored to the diverse needs of Australian homeowners. - read more

Blue Zebra Enhances Insurance Offerings with New Underwriting Partnerships

06 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori

Underwriting agency Blue Zebra has recently announced the establishment of new capacity arrangements for its home building and contents, landlord, and small to medium-sized enterprise (SME) package products. This strategic move is set to enhance the agency's ability to offer comprehensive and competitive insurance solutions tailored to the evolving needs of Australian homeowners and business operators. - read more

AIG Australia Penalised for Claims Handling Failures

06 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori

The Insurance Code Governance Committee has imposed a $30,000 penalty on AIG Australia for breaching its obligations related to claims handling. The insurer failed to inform customers about delays in processing their claims and neglected to advise them of their right to escalate complaints to the ombudsman. This regulatory action underscores the critical importance of transparency and communication in the insurance claims process. - read more

Climate Change Impacting Home Insurance Costs, IAG Reports

05 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori

Insurance Australia Group (IAG), a leading insurer in Australia, has highlighted the significant impact of climate change on the cost of home insurance. The company reports that the increasing frequency and severity of weather events are contributing to rising premiums for homeowners. - read more

Click for more Insurance News