Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

CHU Introduces Cyber Coverage in Strata Insurance Policies

22 May 2026: Paige Estritori

In a significant move to address the evolving risks faced by strata communities, CHU Underwriting Agencies has incorporated cyber protection into its residential strata insurance policies. This enhancement provides coverage of up to $50,000 for losses resulting from social engineering fraud, a type of cybercrime where perpetrators impersonate trusted contacts to manipulate payment instructions. - read more

QBE Introduces Comprehensive Add-Ons to Landlord Insurance Policies

22 May 2026: Paige Estritori

QBE Insurance has unveiled significant enhancements to its commercial landlord insurance offerings, introducing a suite of optional add-ons designed to provide more comprehensive protection for property owners. These strategic enhancements aim to equip brokers with additional tools to better serve their clients in a competitive market. - read more

Blue Zebra Partners with New Underwriters for Home and SME Insurance

22 May 2026: Paige Estritori

Blue Zebra, a prominent underwriting agency, has announced a new capacity arrangement for its home building and contents, landlord, and SME package products. The agency has partnered with a co-insurance panel comprising Chubb, AIG, and HDI Global Specialty, marking a significant shift in its underwriting partnerships. - read more

The Rise of Autonomous Machinery in Australian Agriculture

21 May 2026: Paige Estritori

In recent years, Australian agriculture has witnessed a notable shift towards the adoption of autonomous machinery. This trend reflects a broader global movement aimed at enhancing efficiency and productivity in farming operations. However, despite the growing interest, several challenges continue to impede widespread implementation across the sector. - read more

Analyzing the 2026-27 Federal Budget's Impact on Agriculture

21 May 2026: Paige Estritori

The recently announced 2026-27 Federal Budget has introduced several measures with significant implications for the Australian agricultural sector. These initiatives aim to bolster the industry's resilience and address pressing challenges faced by farmers nationwide. - read more

Click for more Insurance News