Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Why load restraint is an insurance issue for truck operators

27 Aug 2026: Paige Estritori

Recent transport industry reporting has again drawn attention to load restraint, with regulators and enforcement agencies continuing to highlight the risks created by poorly secured freight. For Australian truck operators, the issue is broader than avoiding roadside penalties. A load that moves, spills or falls can quickly become a vehicle damage, cargo, public liability, injury and business interruption problem. - read more

What Builder Collapses Mean for Tradies on the Job

27 Aug 2026: Paige Estritori

Australia's construction sector continues to face pressure, with recent business reporting again pointing to elevated insolvency risk among builders and related operators. For tradespeople, that is not just a headline about another company's balance sheet. A builder collapse can quickly become a practical problem for subcontractors who have materials on site, tools locked in a compound, unpaid invoices, unfinished work and unclear responsibility for damaged or abandoned projects. - read more

New claims data sharpens focus on income protection details

27 Aug 2026: Paige Estritori

APRA's latest life insurance claims and disputes statistics have again put the practical side of personal cover in front of Australian workers. While headline numbers often focus on the overall performance of life insurers, the data is especially relevant for anyone relying on income protection insurance or salary continuance cover to keep household cash flow steady after illness or injury. - read more

Why defect checks matter for truck insurance

27 Aug 2026: Paige Estritori

Recent heavy vehicle industry reporting has again highlighted roadside compliance activity, with enforcement attention on mechanical condition, fatigue records, load restraint and day-to-day maintenance evidence. For truck operators, the message is broader than avoiding an infringement. A defect notice, preventable breakdown or poorly documented maintenance program can also shape how an insurer views risk when cover is renewed or when a claim is assessed. - read more

Insurance Tax Debate Puts Farm Premiums Back in Focus

26 Aug 2026: Paige Estritori

Renewed industry pressure to reduce insurance taxes has put affordability back in the spotlight for rural and regional Australia. The latest debate centres on the extra costs added to insurance through state-based duties, levies and other charges, which can make already expensive cover harder to maintain for households and businesses exposed to flood, bushfire, storm and cyclone risk. - read more

Click for more Insurance News