Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

3

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Australian Insurers Under Investigation for Premium Increases Amid Record Profits

22 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori

In recent developments, Australian insurance companies are facing heightened scrutiny from both government officials and consumer advocacy groups due to substantial increases in insurance premiums. This comes in the wake of the industry reporting record profits, raising questions about the fairness and transparency of pricing strategies. - read more

Rising Insurance Premiums Challenge Australian Homeowners

22 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori

Australian homeowners are confronting substantial increases in home insurance premiums, driven by a combination of more frequent extreme weather events and escalating building costs. Recent data indicates that the average annual premium for new home and contents policies has risen by 14%, equating to an additional $343 per year for policyholders. - read more

Government Launches Investigation into Insurance Industry Practices Amid Rising Premiums

22 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian government has initiated an investigation into the practices of the insurance industry following a surge in consumer complaints regarding significant premium increases and concerns over transparency and fairness. This move comes as policyholders report steep hikes in their insurance costs, with some experiencing increases of up to 600% without clear explanations from their insurers. - read more

AUSactive Unveils Comprehensive Insurance Solution for Fitness Professionals

22 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori

AUSactive, Australia's leading body for the exercise and active health sector, has recently introduced a new insurance product tailored specifically for fitness professionals. This initiative aims to provide enhanced protection while offering more affordable premiums compared to existing market options. - read more

AUSactive and Health Partners Join Forces to Enhance Support for Fitness Professionals

22 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori

AUSactive, the peak body for the exercise and active health sector in Australia, has announced a significant partnership with Health Partners, a not-for-profit health fund with over 85 years of service to South Australians. This collaboration aims to recognize eligible AUSactive personal trainers and fitness businesses as approved providers under Health Partners' Extras policy. - read more

Click for more Insurance News