Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Australian Insurers Face Growing Challenges in Risk Preparedness

22 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori

Recent findings from the PwC Insurance Banana Skins Survey reveal that Australian insurers are falling behind their global counterparts in terms of risk preparedness. The survey, which gathered insights from 698 insurance executives across 42 territories, indicates that Australian insurers scored 6.6% lower on the Preparedness Index compared to the global average. - read more

Rising Legal Costs Impact Small Business Insurance Affordability

22 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori

Small businesses across Australia are facing significant increases in insurance premiums, with rates rising by up to 60% since 2019. The Insurance Council of Australia (ICA) attributes this surge to outdated liability laws, escalating legal costs, and regulatory complexities. - read more

Australian Commercial Insurance Prices Experience Significant Decline

22 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori

In the fourth quarter of 2025, Australian commercial insurance prices experienced a notable decline, with reductions of up to 20%. This trend reflects favorable market conditions that have emerged due to several key factors. - read more

Europ Assistance Australia Now Underwrites Its Own Travel Insurance Policies

21 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori

Europ Assistance Australia (EAA) has achieved a significant milestone by obtaining a general insurance licence from the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA). This development allows EAA to underwrite its own travel insurance products, marking a new chapter in its commitment to Australian travellers. - read more

RACV Highlights Risks of Last-Minute Travel Insurance Purchases

21 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori

Recent insights from the Royal Automobile Club of Victoria (RACV) reveal a concerning trend among Australian travellers: 35% are purchasing travel insurance within seven days of departure, with 5% waiting until the day they leave. This last-minute approach can lead to significant gaps in coverage and benefits. - read more

Click for more Insurance News