Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Western Australia's Transport Sector Pushes for Enhanced Truck Licensing Standards

17 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

Western Australia's transport industry is urging the state government to implement more stringent heavy vehicle licensing requirements, aiming to bolster road safety and ensure drivers possess adequate experience. This initiative follows South Australia's recent reforms, which introduced tougher conditions for truck drivers after a tragic triple fatality in 2024. - read more

Aon's 2026 Report Highlights Escalating Climate Risks for Australian Businesses

17 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

Aon plc, a leading global professional services firm, has released its 2026 Climate and Catastrophe Insight report, shedding light on the escalating climate-related risks facing Australian businesses. The report indicates that insured catastrophe losses in Australia totaled an estimated US$2.9 billion in 2025, underscoring the growing financial impact of climate events on the insurance sector. - read more

Navigating Rising Premiums and Cybersecurity Risks in Australia's Insurance Sector

16 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

As we progress through 2026, Australia's insurance industry is grappling with significant challenges that are reshaping the landscape for both insurers and policyholders. Two primary concerns have emerged at the forefront: the affordability of premiums and the escalating threat of cyber incidents. - read more

Introducing Backd: Affordable Insurance for Casual and Contract Workers

15 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

In a significant move to address the insurance needs of Australia's growing casual and contract workforce, TAL has partnered with global insurtech company Cover Genius to launch Backd. This innovative digital-only insurance product aims to provide accessible and affordable life and income protection coverage to workers who have traditionally faced challenges in obtaining such protection. - read more

Zurich's Home Loan Protection: Tailored Insurance for Mortgage Holders

15 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

Zurich has unveiled its Home Loan Protection (HLP) product, a new insurance offering that combines life and income protection benefits tailored specifically for mortgage holders. This innovative cover automatically adjusts its premiums as the insured's mortgage balance decreases, ensuring that policyholders are only paying for the coverage they need. - read more

Click for more Insurance News