Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

3

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

AFCA Urges Insurance Industry to Improve Premium Explanations to Reduce Disputes

23 Oct 2025: Paige Estritori

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) is calling on insurers to enhance their communication regarding premium increases to help resolve disputes more effectively and fairly. The authority suggests that offering flexible payment options could also aid in managing disputes. - read more

TAL's $4.7 Billion Payout Reflects Rising Insurance Claims in Australia

23 Oct 2025: Paige Estritori

Leading Australian life insurer TAL has reported a substantial $4.7 billion in life insurance claims paid over the 12 months ending March 31, 2025. This figure underscores the significant role life insurers play in providing financial support to Australians during challenging times. - read more

Encompass Protection Recognized as Best Income Protection Provider in 2025

23 Oct 2025: Paige Estritori

Encompass Protection has been honored with the Income Protection Insurance Award at the 2025 Money Magazine Life Insurance Awards. This accolade reflects the company's commitment to providing exceptional coverage and service to Australians seeking income protection solutions. - read more

Marinex Underwriting: A New Era in Australian Marine Insurance

23 Oct 2025: Paige Estritori

In a significant development for Australia's marine insurance sector, Rhodian Group has unveiled its latest venture, Marinex Underwriting. This new agency is set to provide specialised marine insurance products tailored to the unique needs of the Australian market. - read more

Network Marine Insurance Strengthens Ties with Marina Industries Association

23 Oct 2025: Paige Estritori

Network Marine Insurance has recently elevated its commitment to Australia's marina industry by becoming a Bronze Sponsor of the Marina Industries Association (MIA). This partnership underscores the company's dedication to supporting the growth and sustainability of marinas across the nation. - read more

Click for more Insurance News