Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

APRA Intervenes to Freeze Unjustified Premium Increases in Commercial Auto Insurance

09 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

In March 2026, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) took decisive action to address significant premium hikes in the commercial auto insurance sector. Responding to widespread industry concerns, APRA issued emergency regulations to freeze unjustified baseline premium increases exceeding 25%, pending external review. This intervention aims to protect independent transport operators and logistics enterprises from immediate financial strain. - read more

Emergence Insurance Strengthens Cyber Risk Portfolio with Blue Zebra Acquisition

09 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

Emergence Insurance has announced the acquisition of Blue Zebra's cyber insurance portfolio, marking a significant expansion of its cyber risk offerings in the Australian market. This move is set to bolster Emergence's capabilities in providing comprehensive cyber insurance solutions to businesses across the country. - read more

State Government Initiates Bushfire Mitigation Trials in Urban Fringe Areas

09 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

In response to the increasing threat of bushfires in urban fringe areas, a state government has commenced trials of new mitigation measures designed to enhance community safety. These initiatives aim to reduce the risk and impact of bushfires on residential communities situated near bushland. - read more

Key Challenges Facing Australian Insurers in 2026

08 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

As 2026 unfolds, Australian insurers are grappling with three immediate pressures: rising premium costs and shrinking insurability, ongoing cyber and data risks, and increasing difficulty in hiring and retaining skilled workers. According to industry feedback cited in Gallagher Bassett’s upcoming 'The Carrier Perspective: 2026 Claims Insights' report, premium affordability and insurability have become the leading concerns for insurers, linked to rising inflation, increasing climate-related losses, and regulatory pressures. - read more

QLS Announces 15% Reduction in Professional Indemnity Insurance Levies for 2026/27

08 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

The Queensland Law Society (QLS) has recently approved a substantial 15% reduction in professional indemnity (PI) insurance levies for the 2026/27 period. This decision is set to provide significant financial relief to legal practitioners throughout Queensland. - read more

Click for more Insurance News