Insurer Prevails in Fraudulent Rental Claim Dispute

2

The claimant asserted the lot was leased to a company as a conference facility, incurring a monthly rent of $3300, but became uninhabitable due to water damage. While QBE compensated the water damage, initially declining the rental loss claim, they later approved it after a review, disbursing $31,818 from January to October 2022.

However, concerns about the rental claim's legitimacy were raised by the owners' corporation, prompting further investigation. The claimant had provided a formal lease agreement purportedly made on October 1, 2021, but the incorporation of the tenant company occurred almost six months later. The claimant's director admitted the written lease was backdated in tandem with the claim submission, originally having only a verbal agreement, believing the document was necessary for the claim's success.

Furthermore, a rental ledger indicated payments for October through December 2021, which the director later conceded were never made, fabricated to bolster claim acceptance. QBE branded these actions as attempts to unjustly secure entitlements, enabling them to retrieve $46,830 in payments and costs.

Despite opposing the fraud accusation, stating the ledger mistake was not intended to mislead, AFCA concluded the claim was deceptive. They highlighted misrepresentations regarding the timeline of the lease agreement and rent payments as intentional efforts to deceive the insurer. Given the rent claim constituted a major part of the payout, AFCA deemed it justifiable for QBE to reclaim funds.

This resolution underscores the stringent expectations on claim accuracy and integrity, flagging potential repercussions for misleading insurance practices.

Published:Monday, 17th Mar 2025
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Allianz and AWP Face Hefty Penalties for Misleading Insurance Claims 01 Apr 2025: Paige Estritori The Supreme Court of New South Wales has imposed significant criminal penalties on Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd and AWP Australia Pty Ltd. Allianz received a $13.5 million fine, while AWP was fined $3.3 million. These penalties were for falsely or misleadingly promoting financial products online, breaching sections 1041E(1) and 1311(1) of the Corporations Act 2001. - read more

AFCA Rules in Favour of Owners in Lift Vandalism Dispute 28 Mar 2025: Paige Estritori In a landmark decision, the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has mandated that Chubb Insurance replace the hoist ropes of two lifts in an apartment block, following damage attributed to vandalism. The owners' corporation successfully argued that the damage to the lifts was part of a previously recognized vandalism incident. - read more

NSW Government Targets Predatory Practice of Claim Farming 28 Mar 2025: Paige Estritori The New South Wales Government is taking decisive action against 'claim farming', a predatory practice that exploits vulnerable individuals by pressuring them to file compensation claims. This practice often involves unethical tactics targeting susceptible groups, including child abuse survivors. To combat this, the government is set to introduce the Claim Farming Practices Prohibition Bill 2025. - read more

RAA Partners with Duck Creek for Major Tech Overhaul 27 Mar 2025: Paige Estritori The Royal Automobile Association (RAA), a leading motoring group in South Australia, is set to revamp its technology infrastructure by adopting Duck Creek's OnDemand cloud platform. This strategic transition will see RAA's outdated systems for motor and home insurance transformed to include streamlined policy, rating, billing, and claims management, as well as enhanced data handling and insights capabilities. - read more

Consumer Advocates Criticise Insurers Over 'Poverty Premiums' and 'Loyalty Taxes' 26 Mar 2025: Paige Estritori Consumer advocacy groups have voiced strong opposition to the insurance industry's decision to reject recommendations designed to eliminate practices that disadvantage consumers, including charging higher rates for monthly bill payments and increasing renewal premiums for loyal customers. The Financial Rights Legal Centre has cited ongoing reports from consumers being adversely affected by these pricing practices, which they refer to as a 'poverty premium' and a 'loyalty tax.' - read more